I felt pretty confident about our presentation overall, I thought our video was good and our speaking was good, however I do believe that we could have done more for behaviour that would have more clearly depicted how our device worked. Yasu said that it would be beneficial to either show how the fish moved or show renderings of the track on the top surface of the tank. Yoakim did provide a rendering on the final boards of the track so hopefully that is sufficient.
My general overview of ID 6 was that it was a good unit that really challenged us. I do think the downfall though was that being separated into object-behaviour-scenario tutorials meant that we were lacking in two areas. Scenario and Object were straightforward enough but Behaviour is not something we can teach ourselves. I know that Yoakim struggled in this area and it was to our disadvantage that Lisa and I were lacking in the skills to assist him. I've found that many of the students doing behaviour needed Yasu's constant help in this area which probably acts as an indication that this was too complex and/or that not enough time had been allocated to teaching this aspect. Some people excelled in this area, but for the ones that struggled, help was not always available.
I feel as a group we chopped and changed ALOT within our areas. I found that I was probably more suited to scenario and I found that Yoakim was probably more suited to object due to his expertise with CAD. Lisa was suited to both object and scenario. We sort of allocated tasks as we went and completed these pretty efficiently.
No comments:
Post a Comment